The Greatest Guide To Advocate In Chandigarh
92, had been advertized with a guaranteed sum of Rs. The same officers are in chargev of the proceedings under both the enactments. Presumably, these witnesses were examined by the police in the course of the investigation. , that it was meagre evidence on which no conviction could be asked for, should be said to be so improper that the consent of the Court under s. 2013, after examining the issue raised in the representation, the Under Secretary put up the file before the Joint Secretary who Advocates (a total noob) is the Competent Authority under Section 3(1) of the COFEPOSA Act.
47 ary, 1955, by a notification of the Government of Orissa dated the 22nd December, 1954, published in Advocates (a total noob) the Orissa Gazette dated the 31st December, 1954. Assessments under the Excess Profits Tax Act are, subject to the special provisions of that Act, made on the basis of the assessments made under the provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act. 494 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has to be withheld.
, on or before 1-7-1942 the distributors may at their option complete the picture at their own cost and in such case the producer shall be liable to the distributors for all the expenses with compound 237 interest thereon at 12 per cent. The fact is that the proceedings under the two Acts are interdependent. 96,000 odd, the amount of the net collections. Tile prosecution examined a number of witnesses to prove that the' appellant had been holding crossword competitions and a large number of persons had paid moneys by way of entry fees; that the competition in question, namely, competition No.
But if the said picture be not delivered within two months thereafter, viz. it is not quite clear from the first information report whether the 294 informant speak,% to his personal knowledge or what Advocates (a total noob) he heard from the labourers. The order of the Excess Profits Tax Officer dated 23-12-1946 refers in terms to the order dated 28-9- 1946 passed in the proceedings for assess- 153 ment of income-tax on the appellant, and the deficiency of profits is worked out on the basis of the loss of Rs.
Nor, could the complainant's counsel, in the course of arguments before us inform us that there was any additional material available. We see no substance in this contention, which must accordingly be rejected. It would be seen, therefore, that the prosecution must depend upon the evidence of Jadubans Tiwary, and possibly of Sheoji Singh and Ramdhar Singh and that what these three persons could speak to was at best only as to the exhortation made by Mahesh Desai at the various stages.
, it appears to be reasonably clear that the person who gave the information to the informant was Jadubans Tiwary and that his information itself was probably based on what Sheoji Singh and Ramdhar Singh had told him. , other independent statutory provisions amending the Act of 1939 were passed and brought into operation. The first of them was Orissa Ordinance No. 2013 rejected the same. "Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Income- tax Act, 1922, all information contained in any statement or return made or furnished under the provisions of that Act or obtained or collected for the purposes of that Act may be used for the purposes of this Act".
per annum and the distributors shall have all rights as to the distribution, sale, etc. In the event of the producer failing to Advocates, a total noob, deliver the said copies of the said picture duly passed by the Board of Censors as hereinbefore provided before the said period, namely 1-5-1942, the producer shall become liable to pay to the distributors at the letters' option such amount as has been advanced by the distributors to the producer including monies ,spent by the distributors in respect of publicity with interest thereon at 12 per cent.
As regards what is said to have transpired at 6-30 p. While thus the 1952 Act remained on the statute book without its coming into force. The said Authority recorded its comments and submitted the file to the Special Secretary and Director General, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau for consideration, who vide order dated 26. Counter affidavit was filed by the respondents putting forth the stand that before rejecting the representation of the detenu, the requisite process was adhered to, and in support of the same it was asserted that after receipt of the representation of the detenu from the Jail Superintendent by the Deputy Director, Calicut, the same was sent to the Ministry with para-wise comments on 25.
Even the private complainant who was allowed to participate in these proceedings in all its stages, does not, in his Advocates (click for source) objection petition, or revision petitions, indicate the availability of any other material or better material. 11 of 1953 which was promulgated by the Governor of Orissa on the 16th May, 1953. Section 22(2) similarly makes the record of the excess profits tax proceedings admissible in proceedings under the Indian Income-tax Act.
Now, on this material, we find it difficult to appreciate why the opinion arrived at by both the trial court and the Sessions Court that the' view taken of that material by the Public Prosecutor, viz. 15,771 as ascertained therein.
