Google Speak 42776
I do not believe that Google tries some way that is to differently control their markets than in a typically competitive way. And I do not believe that Google is really super-arms army s...
I do not stick within the majority of the existing theories on the conspiracy of Google. I do not believe either that Google provides a preference to the Internet sites which announce in its program of AdWords, or which it moves away particular sites from-the first pages to inspire them to announce.
I really do not believe that Google tries some way that is to differently manage their markets than in a generally competitive way. And I don't think that Google is really super-arms military solution. I do think that Google has good intentions. But these goals continue to frighten me. Eventually, that I think of Google is pure play, based on facts easily available, but this speculation on Google appears to be to-day the activity of many people.
It is not just a wonder: after-all, Google is simply the business more intrigante which includes honored our economy for 10-years. I believe that Google has good intentions, but as good as they can be, caused by their success scares me. The creators of Google has to be platonists If Plato always lived, it would probably benefit Google. Google is searching for ideal, even if that one is finally inaccessible. With the difference of the majority of the principal organizations which can make the titles of the financial magazines, Google isn't mainly justified from the money.
The motivation of Google will be the Intellectual, overcoming the challenges of organized information. Google known as: The goal of Google will be to manage world information and to create it generally available and of use. And it's what it does. This provider quantified to many million dollars, indisputably among most effective in the world, has the target simple to manage world data. This grand guide to evernote ftp paper has a few commanding cautions for why to see about this concept.
Google is the vastest system of catalogue of world. To read more, consider checking out: evernote ftp. Naturally, that does not wish to say that Google doesn't have any enthusiasm for your money - and it has truly some. The machine with under that's Google will be the containing hydrocarbon certainly one of its idealistic dreams. Google could matter more difficulties, to bring more ressouces and it achieves finally more thanks to this money. Though the money never prevents the act collecting, planning and from making information available, with contrario of Microsoft.
Although the goal of Microsoft is to help individuals and the businesses to achieve their full capabilities, this help isn't free. The essential products of Microsoft are made to be sold. It's the traditional model of the economic practices. In contrast to this traditional style of organization, that of Google is extremely idealistic. That may be as a result of fact that Google was not intended to make-money, but instead in a reaction to the challenge that Sergey Brin and Larry Page create by devel-oping a highly effective search engine.
To include/understand the new developments of Google Schmidt: We work hard to keep this picture to be uncontrollable. But makes some, our company is very calculated. And that belonged to our secrecy. Page: Broadly speaking, we don't discuss our approach as it is proper. I choose to let genuinely believe that we are confused in the place of to create known with our opponents what we can do. -- Extract of an interview of Times Magazine Well, let be if you ask me the first ever to congratulate the Servant boys on Google. Your purpose to appear unmanageable was achieved.
Over these last years, Google presented many products which made type the top of the authorities contrary to the walls. A number of these launchings met the thin agreement, or created a complete confusion (it is perhaps not what Google is prudent to do?). These products also seem to be fairly independent: products which will make it possible to visitors to organize their planning (Google Calendar), or to analyze the research of their Internet sites (Google Analytics).
The idea which prevails is that Google launches these products like types of increasing the conscience of mark, to generate other programs with their AdWords plan, as well as for simply releasing something to determine if it gains a broad approval (like Google SiteMaps). But, if we examine these products in the light of their mission (to gather and organize world data), each item goes to-the overall mission of Google. Eventually, Google collects well data and in very good part.
Out of this time just, Google could start its classification. Today Google seeks the information of the consumers, the latter demand also for that. The majority of the new services of Google store the data of the people. If you use the program of tchat of Google, you can store your entire interactions in a history with chance for research. Google Finance stores information on your beloved stocks, on that you start a tracking.
GMail enables you to store until 3GB e-mails, you bonus ergo automatically to not take them off (it's perhaps what Google wants?). Google Base was introduced under the strange description that it was the place where to issue and store your contents, any contents. Google Reader stores your records of move RSS, and now Google Calendar is built-into GMail and other companies to provide you with the possibility of keeping still more information due to Google.
Google does not launch new products to improve the conscience of mark; it launches these new products to collect more information and to understand how all this information functions together. This information can be related to a registered person, and can be removed utilizing the different products from Google (such integration of Google Calendar in GMail). Up to which place I do want that Google knows? If we really live in the time of information, then Google might become the strongest organization of-the world.
Even though I did not see any standard study on the subject, I don't think that whoever will be surprised by understanding that there's more the data saved at Google than at any other company or multinational in all the human history. Even with all of this information, Google seeks often more. The problem that we ought to be asked is only familiarity with which sum of information holds only one company. Let's be us opposed if Google Wallet became your own center of finance where you could handle your scales in the budget, pay your invoices online, and receive personalized financial reports/ratios (naturally all accessible and integral in Google Finance).
Is this it towards what we move with Google while understanding a little bit too much about us? Each new solution of Google is used to him to gather more information. For another way of interpreting this, please gander at: here. While this goal to gather, organize and provide this information to the whole world, is actually a fairly simple goal, do not shouldn't put to us on pause one moment: do we really want that Google achieves this goal?.
