Simranjeet Advocate In Chandigarh - An Overview
1 levied out of the seaman's wages after he signs the agree- ment of employment amounts to remuneration received for providing the man with employment. The remuneration paid how to get divorce the accused which is over Rs. 2,000 a month is by way of salary from the Calcutta Liners' Conference under whom he is a paid Secretary. The Calcutta Maritime Board receives Re. The last purchase by the Raja of Aul of some interest in the zamindari was made in the year 1935 and having acquired by this date a substantial interest in it and having discov- ered that the fishery was a paying proposition, he brought this suit in the year 1986 on the allegations set out above and asserted that since about three years the defendants had started disturbing his possession of the fishery in dispute.
41 obligates the State within the limits of its economic capacity and development, to make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to provide assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and 498A advocates chandigarh disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want. 43 (3) requires the State to endeavour to secure amongst other things full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities. It is however impossible to overlook, that the Constitution Bench noticed the Randhir Singh case1, and while affirming the principle of equal pay for equal work, extended it to pensionary entitlements also.
(ii) This Court held, that it was not open to the Government to exploit citizens, specially when India was a welfare state, committed to a socialist pattern of society. This Court held that the mandate of Article 14 ensured, that there would be equality before law and equal protection of the law. Having found, that employees engaged by different Nehru Yuvak Kendras in the country were performing similar duties as regular Class-IV employees in its employment, it was held, that they must get the same salary and conditions of service as regular Class-IV employees, and that, it made no difference whether they were appointed on sanctioned posts or not.
It was inferred therefrom, that there must be equal pay for equal work. So long as they were performing the same duties, they must receive the same salary. The argument raised by the Government was found to be violative of the mandate of equality, enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution. Provided that the registering officer shall dispense with the execution of cancellation deeds by executant and claimant parties to the previously registered deeds of conveyances on sale before him if the cancellation deed is executed by a Civil Judge or a Government Officer competent to execute Government orders declaring the properties contained in the previously how to get divorce registered conveyance on sale to be Government or Assigned or Endowment lands or properties not register able by any provision of law.
12/92 on 27th March, 1992. The said circular is as follows:- "Reserve Bank of India had earlier notified that arrangements were being made to purchase Exim scrips at an appropriate premium from those holders of Exim Scrips who wish to dispose of them. The bona fide holder of the Exim scrips should submit an application to the designated branch of the State Bank of India, in the form prescribed by the State Bank of India. The list of branches which would be purchasing these Exim scrips would be notified by the State Bank of India.
5 lakhs, the concerned branch would send it to the office of the JCCI, which had issued the scrip, for authentication and on receipt of the scrip duly authenticated would pay the amount of premium. Where the face value of the scrips exceeds Rs. The scrips up to the face value of Rs. 5 lakhs will be straightaway purchased by the designated branch of State Bank of India and the premium amount would be paid to the holder of the scrips. The designated branches of State Bank of India would be purchasing these Exim scrips from March 23, 1992, up to the end of May 1992, at a premium of 20 per cent of the face value.
The learned counsel for the respondents has further sought to attack the testimony of this prosecution witness on the ground of delay in recording of her statement by the Investigating Officer. In this context, we may note that the Trial Court has observed that PW5 was cross-examined on practically every detail of the prosecution story and her statement corroborated every part thereof , (2004) 10 SCC 583, does not pertain to the case of a child delay in recording of evidence was not per se held to be fatal to the prosecution case but the testimony of the child witness in each case was found to be incredible on account of material contradictions and lack of independent corroboration.
In support of this submission, learned counsel has relied upon the judgments of this However, we find that none of these cases help the case of the Ors. We find that this is not the case here. On the facts it was clear that the Magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence on the 20th of January. The question argued before the High Court was in respect of the power of the family lawyer chandigarh high court Court to grant bail after the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act were applied to the case.
magistrate as such applies his mind to the suspected commission of an offence" have to be read in the light of these facts. As noticed above, the magistrate had expressly recorded that he had taken cognizance of the case and thereupon the provi- sions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act were made applicable to the case. The observations "taking cognizance does not involve any formal action or indeed action of any kind but occurs as soon as a. 320 SUPREME COURT REPORTS no opportunity to see the record of the case.
In our opinion therefore that decision and the observations therein do not help the appellant.
