Advocate Simranjeet Singh Sidhu Accident Injury Settlement Tips - I Want To Fire My Chandigarh Advocate Simranjeet Law Associates 815 Sector 16 D Chandigarh 160015
2516 of 1951,) and it is in respect of this suit that the application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act has been made. Now how can we live when our living is more than a hell. 1959, the appellant was automatically entitled to œryotwari patta, in respect of the land in question. There were prayers in the plaint for a declaration that the plaint. This is our cultured and democratic society. off was not a party to the said contracts and, that it had no liability under the same.
It is only if there was a subsisting lease when the 1987 Act was promulgated, Section 82 can be invoked. In other words, those words have the effect of relieving the lessee from the burden of this covenant if the lessor withholds his consent unreasonably in case of proposed assignment to a respectable or responsible person. We say so because, it is only when the possession and occupation of the agricultural land is subsequent to the first day of July, 1945, that the State Government would examine the circumstances of each case, and thereupon, in an appropriate case, issue a direction, that œryotwari patta was to be extended to the tenant of such agricultural land.
The legal incidents of such a covenant are now well established by judicial decisions referred to in the judgment of the High Court and it is not statute, resource for this article, necessary to refer to them in detail. We are therefore of opinion that the Province of East Bengal having succeeded to the liability to which the Province of Bengal was subject immediately before the ap- pointed day, the former Province is to be deemed to be substituted for the other Province as a party to the suit and the suit must accordingly continue in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore, which has jurisdiction to proceed with it under article 4 of the Indian Independence (Legal Proceedings) Order, 1947.
32/1974 was decreed in favour of the appellant, and it was duly declared that the appellant was in possession of the land in question. Insofar as instant issue is concerned, Original Suit No. 1959, the agricultural land in question in the revenue Estate of Sangam Agraharam village, was duly declared as an Inam Estate. I struggled continuously for 1 ½ years but now no more. This is the reason that I bore all such pains but still body of laws formula (resource for this article) - resource for this article, remain alive. However, since Original Suit No.
First and foremost, it needs to be determined, whether there is an existing lease of agricultural land between the appellant and respondent no. If any part of the building falls within the regular line of a public street either existing or as determined for the future or beyond the front of immediately adjoining building, the Corporation may issue a notice either that part which is projecting or some portion of the part projecting, shall be removed or that when the building is rebuilt, the portion projecting shall be set back to and the portion of the land added to the street by anarchical - crown prosecutor - such œsetting back or removal, shall henceforth be deemed to be part of the public street and shall vest in the Corporation.
My husband was also to die by them. 32/1974 clearly declared, that the agricultural land in question was under the tenancy of the appellant and his ancestors well prior to the notified date " 17. The contentions next advanced by learned counsel for the appellant relate to the lessee's covenant contained in sub- clause (6) of clause 2 of the lease to which reference has already been made. It was alleged in the plaint that the plaintiff acted merely as broker and in that capacity brought about the two contracts of sale and purchase evidenced by the two Bought Notes mentioned above, that the real seller was a firm known as Gowarchand Danchand, and that the plaintiff not being a party to the contract could not incur any liability under its terms.
That being the position, in terms of Section 11 of the 1948 Act, the appellant automatically became entitled to a œryotwari patta. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced at the hands of the learned counsel for the rival parties. In this view of the matter, the plaintiff contended that he being a respectable and responsible person the lessor had unreasonably withheld his consent to the proposed assignment to him and had consequently relieved the defendant from the burden of his covenant so that the defendant could legally and validly assign the lease to him without such consent of the lessor.
Suffice it to say, that the words "such consent, however, not to be unreasonably withheld in the case of respectable or responsible person" contained in the covenant do not amount to a separate or independent covenant by the lessor that he would not refuse consent except upon reasonable grounds in the case of respectable or responsible person, but that those words limit or qualify the lessee's covenant not to assign the demised premises without the consent in writing of the lessor.
The right of the appellant in the aforesaid Inam Estate is obviously dependent on the determination of the tenancy claim of the appellant prior to 17. The words that the part or some portion of the part projecting beyond the regular line of the public street may be : I also filed a case before the Human Rights Commission. " All matters, questions, disputes, differences and/ or claims arising out of and/or concerning and/or in connection with and/or in consequence of or relating to this contract, whether or not the obligations of either or both parties under this contract be subsisting at the time of such dispute and, whether or not this contract has been terminated or purported to be terminated or completed, shall be referred to the arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce -under the rules of its Tribunal of Arbitration for the time being in force and according to such rules the arbitration shall be conducted.
" The notes were signed by the respondent, Moran and Company, describing themselves as brokers. In our considered opinion, it is clear that Section 305 deals with the power of Corporation to regulate line of buildings. My daughters are so intelligent that one is doing pre-medical test and the second is doing Master of Computer Applications. We are satisfied, that consequent upon issuance of a notification under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari), Act 1948 on 17.
1 " Sri Sangameswara Swamy Varu. The appellant and his ancestors were also held to be in continuous possession of the land in question, well before the notified date " 17. If there is any justice in this cultured and democratic society then at least my in-laws should be punished after our death and every common man should get justice. I pleaded before the Prime Minister, President and Chief Minister but there is no one for me in this society.
